GUIDING HAND
 
Let’s take some time off from analyzing the 2004 campaigns. It is July, the race is essentially "on hold" until the Democrats have their infomercial/convention up in Boston next week. Then Kerry/Edwards will get a spike of positive energy, their poll ratings will go up a bit and - thankfully - August will arrive and the Olympics will take over our national attention.
Instead, it is a good time to look at the ‘bigger picture’: our lives, our future and our country.
Here is what things look like today in this country: despite incredible material wealth, wonderful technological advances and instant communication, more people are unhappy - even miserable - than ever before.
How can this be?
How can people - even people with few job or money worries - be more unhappy than their grandparents were back in the Great Depression and World War II?
The answer is simple: they have lost touch with God, with their inner soul - and they have become obsessed with the material world to the exclusion of the more-important spiritual world. In sum, they are missing the best in life.
So many people are so unhappy. The state of romance and marriage has never been worse. Over-eating, drinking and drugging has never been higher. Obesity consumes the nation.
What is going on?
People have lost a purpose to their lives.
And they have forgotten - or never knew - the real key to having a great life: asking God for whatever you want or need.
So many people are totally ignorant of this key to life. Maybe Political Correctness has so driven out a real understanding of God’s power or else organized religion is so focused on another agenda that this simple, basic fact is being missed by so many people.
You do not need drugs, booze, fast food, infidelity or money to solve your problems; those items will actually compound your problems.
What works best is a simple daily conversation with God in which you simply ask God to bless you in specific ways you ask for.
And do you know what?
More than you know, God will answer you.
He will help solve your problems - a lot more effectively than Washington ever could.
What has happened in this country since the 1960's is really sickening. Government and PC leftists have run an organized campaign to denigrate God and religion and the special relationship God has with this country. The liberals are ignorant of something basic in our fabric: one of the key motivators for the early American settlers was their fervent desire to communicate with God directly - something forbidden by European Christianity in the 17th century. It is true: in those days, you were forbidden from even believing God would listen to you! You had to pray through your Church and your priest or minister.
America was unique in every way. Yes, vast natural resources and potential great material wealth awaited the settlers.
But none of that would have worked without the Guiding Hand of a God who selected a certain type of man and woman to come and become Americans.
Today’s New Leftists don’t want to hear any of this; they are the ones who have ripped the soul out of this country and tried to replace it with Big Government.
But if America is to survive - and if we are to become again a country of happy people - the American people need to revive their personal relationships with God first. They need to ask God to help them. He will show us the way. He always does.

DUMPING CHENEY


Last week it was former New York Republican Senator Al D’Amato; today it is the front page of the New York Times.

The subject?

Whether President Bush should dump Vice President Dick Cheney off the ticket this year.

This kind of talk only happens when a ticket is in Big Trouble. Republicans sense that the Bush-Cheney ‘04 team could actually lose to the most liberal senator - and this is after 9/11 and the talk in those days that Bush could “never be defeated.”

This race is basically tied - and the GOP is worried to death that Bush might follow his Daddy’s foot-steps into retirement after one term in the White House. And they perceive Cheney as one of the major reasons the ticket is in trouble - and thus the whispering campaign has begun.

The problem is this: to get rid of Cheney now looks panicky, weak and desperate. True, if Cheney had a real health crisis - say another heart attack - he could be removed with less political fall-out. But short of that, the ‘how’ you get him off the ticket would only hurt the President’s re-election prospects.

Dick Cheney is immensely loyal to the Bush family, especially to George HW Bush and Barbara Bush; many, in fact, believe that the Bush parents manipulated the 2000 Vice Presidential selection process to avoid another Dan Quayle fiasco and that they wanted Cheney all along.

The Bushes are loyal. Period.

But they also want to win - badly.

They undoubtedly have explored dumping Cheney. The problem is how to do it - and who to replace him with that really helps.

Powell, Giuliani, Frist and Rice have all been named.

But the baggage that Cheney allegedly brings - Haliburton, architect of the Iraq War, corporate ‘insider’, excessive secrecy - are not going away with Cheney. These issues have become Bush’s problems, too.

The sadness of the decline of GW Bush is that Ronald Reagan had successfully transformed the GOP’s image from a “party for Wall Street” to the “party of Main Street.”

But this Bush Administration has allowed its enemies to re-cast the Republican Party again as the ‘playpen of the rich,’ a ‘safe-haven for crooked CEOs,’ and a ‘party more for the powerful than the little people.’

In four years this Administration has done more damage to the image of the Republican Party than anyone could have imagined. How else is it possible that a leftist like John Kerry - totally out of the mainstream for his entire public career - could even be close to an incumbent president in the polls?

The reality is not as bad as this image problem. But in politics
perception is reality.

There is one other Bush Family consideration to the ‘Dump Cheney’ issue: the future of Jeb Bush.

The Bushes want a clear shot to keep control of the GOP for Jeb in 2008; nominating anyone other than a Cheney-like caretaker with no presidential aspirations of his/her own presents a potential competitor to Jeb. And they don’t want that.

So they will probably keep Cheney.

And sink - or swim - with him.

MEDIA ADVISORY

Counter Clinton Library to be featured Tonight on Comedy Central's The Daily Show

In a continuing effort to bring the truth to every audience in America, the Counter Clinton Library will be featured tonight, July 14, in a special segment on Comedy Central's nightly news/entertainment program The Daily Show. This appearance is an excellent opportunity to remind viewers of Clinton's embarrassing tenure in office with an entertaining spin, while also raising the public's awareness about the Counter Clinton Library.

Hosted by Jon Stewart, this program takes a lighthearted look at the news of the day. The show's ratings and popularity have continued to increase since the show's "Indecision 2000," an ongoing special about the 2000 elections. A similar "Mock the Vote" continuous segments is beginning for November 2004. The Counter Clinton Library will join the ranks of former political and entertainment guests, including Senator John McCain. Hillary Clinton was a guest on the show as well; the Library will counteract her this week with the truth about the dual Clinton presidency.

The prime time appearance proves that the Counter Clinton Library continues to build momentum and gain support throughout the country. This opportunity is only the beginning of more efforts to remind the American people of the Clinton years and ensure that the truth is not glazed over by the Clinton PR machine. The Library's goal remains steadfast and clear: to let not one Clinton lie go unanswered, to let not one Clinton dodge go unquestioned and to let not one Clinton slander go unchallenged.

The show will air tonight, Wednesday, on Comedy Central at 11pm EST. Comedy Central is Direct TV channel 249. To find Comedy Central on your cable provider, check your local listings.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Paid for by the Counter Clinton Library | www.CounterClintonLibrary.com


You are receiving this email because you or someone on your behalf signed up to receive email updates from Counter Clinton Library, or you are a previous donor. If you would like be be removed from future mailings, please go to http://ccl.focusds.net/. Enter your email address and click unsubscribe. Thank you.

CAMPAIGN NOTES PART II


1) The idea of postponing this fall’s election is totally absurd. As a Republican conservative, I am embarrassed to have such an idea surface from a GOP Administration. Just imagine the outrage on the Right if this idea had come out of the Clinton Administration in 2000 - just months before he was due to leave office. We would be screaming - many were anyway - that “Clinton has a plan to stay in office!”

We, the people, run this country. To let some terrorist - or some inside-the-beltway, un-elected bureaucrat - determine whether an election is to be held or not is a total disgrace.

Let us hope this inane idea has been shelved - permanently.

2) The Senate Intelligence Committee Report on WMD and Iraq is yet another sign of something written in this space long ago: Bush’s Achilles Heel would be this cancerous intelligence ‘tumor’ that has become a government within the government.

It is so true. Who is really running our government? We went to war over weapons that did not exist. Yet the President, the CIA Director - even the Secretary of State - told us these weapons did exist. Now they all just want to blame the CIA. How about “the buck stops here”?

When you go to a doctor for surgery - say, a brain operation - and the surgeon operates on the wrong side of the brain (as happened several years ago at New York’s Memorial Sloan Kettering Hospital) - the surgeon will try to lay it off on a technician “who placed the X-ray backwards on the screen.” But the doctor is in charge; it is his ultimate responsibility.

In the case of Iraq, President Bush was obsessed with Iraq from Day One. He has indeed removed Saddam - and that part of it is a plus. The key question is can Iraq be “put back together” into a unified nation or will it descend into civil war and chaos.

And how long do American troops have to stay there?



3) Team Bush is quietly exploring the possibility of removing Vice President Dick Cheney from the ticket. But they won’t end up doing it. It’s too messy, to ‘panicky,’ and there is no natural replacement that makes the GOP ticket automatically stronger.

Prediction: Cheney will be a net ‘negative’ for the Republican ticket in this race. He is a lightening rod without offsetting that with assets that help the ticket.

4) Edwards will be a thorn in the side of Hillary Clinton for the rest of her career. As a young, very ambitious, attractive southern man, he will bedevil her in her attempt to be nominated for President down the line. Let us examine a few scenarios:

A) The Kerry-Edwards ticket wins. They will then be re-nominated in 2008. That means Hillary can’t run until 2012 - and she will then have Edwards also running. Edwards will have seized control of the party machinery and built up chits all over the country.

B) Kerry-Edwards lose this November. You can bet John Edwards will ‘go for it’ in 2008 and it will be an all-out war between him and Hillary for the Democratic nomination. In this scenario, she has to move even farther ‘left’ to get the nomination, thus making it harder to win in November.

C) Kerry-Edwards wins and then along the way something happens to Kerry and Edwards becomes President. (Keep in mind that one out of three Vice Presidents becomes President.) Edwards will control the Democratic Party. You can bet he will want to remove the threat of the Clintons running the Democratic Party in any way.

In fact, Kerry, too, will use the Clintons for their fund-raising abilities, but he will keep as far away from them as possible. If he wins, Kerry will not allow the Clintons to ‘infect’ his administration.

5) There will not be a terrorist attack inside the United States before the election. We have tuned up all our security forces. Look for a big attack on US forces or interests some where else.

POLITICAL NOTES


OK, we have the Democratic ticket. A few thoughts:

1) Kerry is a total bore as a TV candidate. Really, really bad. Just totally unlikeable. If Bush loses to Kerry, then Bush will go down in history as the President who blew it Big Time to the Biggest Jerk of all time.

2) Edwards does bring a little juice - and sex appeal - to the ticket. Some people have told me that one of his strongest ‘intrinsic’ appeals is that he has remained happily married to his now-plump wife. Women find it attractive that a good-looking guy didn’t dump the wife for some babe.

3) Edwards vs. Cheney: that debate is going to be Edwards, the lawyer for the ‘little guy’ versus Halliburton CEO Dick Cheney. The young, smiling Edwards versus old, experienced Dick Cheney. Neither will win or lose the debate; both will score their points and supporters of both will see what they want.

4) In fact, these presidential and vice presidential debates are just one part of the formulation of a ‘clear picture’ of the candidates. Al Gore - a total weirdo - came into focus over those three debates. We do not yet know how Kerry, Bush and the two Veep candidates will come off.

5) Change is the key this year. Do the voters want to maintain the Status Quo - or do they want a change? The former means Bush wins; the latter and Kerry wins. As of today, 52% say they “it is time for someone new.” Of course that opinion can change between now and November 2. But you know what? November is getting closer! It used to be said in the Bush campaign - circa March and April - “Oh, there is plenty of time for perceptions of Iraq and the economy to change.” But time is now beginning to run out - and the perception of Iraq is getting worse! And, despite favorable dry economic data, a majority of people still are unhappy over the direction - or ‘track’ - of the economy.

6) Prediction: G.W. Bush will suffer in the debates because of not having had any debates for four years, while Kerry has just had over 30 cattle call debates through the primaries. Debating is like any other competition: practice makes you better, quicker, faster and more confident. Any President of the United States, upon taking office, finds staff and friends no longer willing to challenge them in strong arguments and debates; instead they are over deferential to the office of the Presidency. Thus, a President can easily become soft when it comes to debating skills. Bush, never a strong debater anyway, will get off to a bit of a rocky start in the three debates this fall - and then he will improve in each successive one.

7) TV ads are very over-rated in this race. It is not the paid commercials that change perceptions; it is news media coverage of news events - Iraq especially - and voters’ own life experiences that determine how they vote.

8) Iraq is the key. Bush bet the ranch on Iraq and he will either win or lose because of it. He had an 89% approval rating after 9/11 and his successful war in Afghanistan. The entire world was with him; even the French paper Le Monde declared, “We are all Americans now.” No one in America opposed Bush after 9/11. And certainly no one ever thought he would have any difficulty running for re-election. Yet here we are with Bush trailing an awful liberal like the phony John Kerry! Why? Iraq! It is all Iraq.

9) If Prime Minister Alawi really does grant amnesty to those who killed Americans, we should pack up and leave. Period.

10) There is a small chance Bush will dump Cheney. Who would he then pick? Not Rudy Giuliani - New York is totally in Kerry’s column anyway - but John McCain. Why? To go after those crucial independent voters who like the feisty McCain.

Well, we are going to learn John Kerry's Veep pick within an hour or two.

The most logical pick: Senator Bob Graham of Florida.

Why?

Graham is by far the most popular elected official in the crucial Sunshine State; he has been governor and senator for almost 30 years.

Plus, in the Senate he chaired the Senate Intelligence Committee and was the first Senator - or first anyone for that matter - to go after the Bush Administration on 9/11 failures and the war in Iraq. And that is now the main issue in the election.

The role of the Vice Presidential candidate is to lead the charge against the oppositie ticket; Graham has proven he is willing to do that.

Plus, if anyone can 'deliver' Florida this time for the Democrats, it would be Graham.

Well, we'll find out in a few hours.

KERRY MONEY


The stunning announcement that the Kerry Campaign has now raised $175 million tells us much about the upcoming fall election:

1) The anti-Bush passion is at an unprecedented level. Even Nixon in 1972 was not despised and reviled by the Left as much as Bush is today.

No Democrat has ever raised cash as easily and as quickly as Kerry. This is not due to Kerry himself; it is entirely due to the belief that Bush can be defeated this November.

Funds are just pouring into the Kerry Campaign. His Internet fundraising alone has pulled in over $50 million - and that is with virtually no cost!

2) Back in 2000, the GW Bush Campaign achieved equally unprecedented fundraising success - for much the same reason. That year the GOP and conservatives were totally focused on defeating Al Gore. The stench of the Clintons was fresh - and we just wanted to get the whole Clinton-Gore Team out of the White House. Once polls determined that George W. Bush could womp Al Gore, the GOP coalesced around Bush and all the money went to him - and fast.

The passion in 2000 was the mirror-opposite of this year’s: it was all anti-Gore. Few voters knew G.W. Bush or really cared; all they wanted was to get Gore - and by extension the Clintons - out of the White House.

Now, a mere four years later, the same passion has taken over the Left: they loathe and despise Bush to such an extent that they are forking over cash left and right to anyone and anything that can beat Bush. Thus the rise of Michael Moore’s anti-Bush movie. And also thus the rise of left-wing 527s - the new ‘soft money’ groups that legally skirt the new campaign finance laws and supplement the Kerry TV advertising campaign.

3) The Big Question is this: will this anti-Bush passion be enough to sweep out Team Bush? Or is there a corresponding conservative, anti-Kerry passion?

So far there is decidedly not a passion on the right to equal 2000. Conservatives are a little ‘down’ this year. Not a day goes by without yet another story of a former Bush voter or conservative (i.e. Arnaud de Borchgrave, Charles Pierce) announcing that he/she is not voting for Bush this year. While President Bush still has overwhelmingly strong support from GOP voters, their passion is reduced this year. This could hurt on Election Day by a slightly reduced Bush voter turnout while the Kerry forces see an extraordinarily huge turnout.

By the way, if Kerry picks Hillary as his running mate all bets are then off. She is such a detested and polarizing figure that her presence on the ticket would motivate the Right to come out like they did in 2000.

4) Polling ‘internals’: these numbers - not the vaunted ‘head-to-head horse race’ numbers - tell us a lot:

A) The new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll now shows a plurality of voters believe Mr. Bush “deliberately deceived” the nation on WMD evidence in order to get us into the war in Iraq. This is a devastating development for the Bush Campaign. It ties in with last week’s Gallup poll that showed Kerry - of all people! - beating Bush 52%-39% on the question of “who is more honest and trustworthy.”

B) The ‘right track-wrong track’ number, while slightly improved from one month ago, still shows a huge plurality of people who think the country is headed in the wrong direction.

C) On the question “is it time for someone new in the White House?” a majority - 52% - indeed “want someone new.”

All these ‘internals’ are bad for Bush. While they don’t mean he will lose in November, they are all reminiscent of other recent one-term presidents who were defeated for re-election: Carter & Bush. Both were swept out of office in a time of ‘wrong track time for a change’ unhappiness.

As of today, John Kerry is profiting from this national mood. The money flowing into his coffers is tangible proof of it.

He has yet to pick his running mate, have his convention and give his crucially important acceptance speech.

All of these steps serve to ‘introduce’ Kerry to a nation that still does not yet know him.

Team Bush has one big hope left: that to know John Kerry is not to like him.

If so, Bush may be able to overcome this wave against him and win a battle of equally unpopular opponents.

But if enough of the country decides Kerry is at least ‘acceptable,’ then Bush may follow Carter and his father into retirement.

ENEMY TACTICS


In this ongoing war inside Iraq once again, the entire issue of captured soldiers and hostages has turned out to be a crucial tactic for the enemy. Let me explain:

In all wars, the capturing of enemy soldiers and holding them for negotiating purposes is a tried and true part of the play book. Going all the way back to the Greek and Roman Wars, POWs served an important role.

In the last century, Germany, the Soviet Union, North Korea, Red China and North Vietnam all held and exploited American POWs.

But it was the arrival of live satellite television that elevated the prisoner/hostage issue to new heights. The first instance was Iran, November 4, 1979. The seizing of the American Embassy and the capture of 52 American hostages changed everything - from the balance of power in the Middle East to the outcome of the 1980 American presidential election.

Ironically, it was exactly one year to the day - November 4, 1980 - that Jimmy Carter lost to Ronald Reagan - in great part due to Carter’s inept handling of the hostage crisis.

Of course, on Inauguration Day, Ayatollah Khomeini released the hostages instead of facing the wrath of Reagan, who had called the Iranians “barbarians’ during the 1980 campaign.

Jump ahead to the present mess in Iraq: the issue of ‘prisoners’ is dominant - on both sides. The still-expanding prisoner abuse scandal is, as General Norman Schwarzkopf said yesterday on MSNBC, “One of the worst things to happen to our policy. It will, in my view, set us back 20 years in the Middle East.”

This prisoner-abuse scandal has given a new impetus to the bad guys to use similarly rough tactics on American soldiers. The apparent execution of Keith Maupin and the threatened beheading of a Muslim Marine are yet further examples.

And the widespread seizing of other hostages - Japanese, Koreans, Turkish - has also been enhanced by world-wide satellite TV coverage.

The recent beheadings - Nick Berg, Paul Johnson and the young, pleading-for-his-life South Korean translator - are all emailed worldwide and are available for millions to see within minutes.

What a PR weapon for Al Qaeda and Radical Islam!

They can reach the world - through our own technology - and recruit more crazed-with-hate young Muslims to their cause.

All with a video camera, a laptop, a knife - and a new victim.

This level of barbarity is not new; just the seeing of it daily on TV is new.

And we better get used to it because they will keep doing it.

Our recourse?

1) Put more emphasis on getting Osama Bin Laden - now!

2) Get the world community to join us in pressuring Pakistan and Saudi Arabia to close all Madrassas (schools that teach Radical Islam) ASAP! These joints are nothing but boot camps for future terrorists. Until we address this cancer head-on we are fooling ourselves. Radical Islam is today’s Naziism, today’s Soviet Communism. Why are we so afraid to attack it? Why not rename the War on Terror the War on Radical Islam?

This is NOT a war on all of Islam, just this particular sect which is out to wipe out Western and Christian values. We certainly have the right - especially after 9/11 - to attack back and try to destroy it.

And now - thanks to home videos of POWs and hostages being exploited and executed - every American can see and hear the evil of our enemy.

UPDATES Part I


At the suggestion of a few loyal and wonderful readers, it is time to update and review some past topics discussed in this space:

1) Scott Speicher: After much hope last year when Baghdad fell, this case has fallen off the radar screen. Why?

Is it because he indeed never did survive his January, 1991 shoot-down - as the USG always insisted - or it is because he was later killed - or is he still alive?

The problem with this case is that the USG lied so often in the past about missing soldiers and the USG also lied so much in order to ‘goose’ the nation into going to war in Iraq. Did they also lie about supposedly ‘new’ intel that proved Scott was still alive and being held by Saddam’s son?

Did this new intel come from the now-discredited Ahmed Chalabi?

Or is much of Chalabi’s intelligence still good and accurate?

What of British intelligence that also claimed to know that Scott was alive and being held in an underground facility under Salman Pak? And some other European nation also had intel on this.

What of the US Senators who received classified briefings which showed new intel?

Even the Clinton Administration, in its final month, re-classified Speicher as MIA instead of KIA based on new intelligence. What was it?

All of this - and I mean all of it - should now be made public. Let us decide if Scott is alive - and if we have been lied to.

And if he could still be alive - any where, including Syria, Iran or some other Islamic nation - let’s go get him.


2) Polling: The most startling aspect of this week’s ABC NEWS-Washington Post poll is the question - “Who is more honest and trustworthy?” The findings? John Kerry beat G.W. Bush 52% to 39%.

In other words, President Bush’s has lost much of his strong suit: the appearance of being a straight-shooter who told it as it was.

This finding is devastating to the President’s re-election campaign.

When an incumbent president is no longer believed, he probably is not going to be re-elected. I say ‘probably’ because perhaps Bob Dole was deemed more ‘honest and trustworthy’ than Bill Clinton and Clinton still won; I do not have that polling history.

Maybe if Iraq is calm and the economy is perceived as improving, Bush can win despite this awful number.

But if Iraq continues to spiral into chaos, then Bush’s trustworthiness will suffer anyway and he may get thrashed in November.

3) War on Terror: This should be called the War Against Radical Islam. But the same ABC News-Washington Post poll showed that for the first time John Kerry defeats G.W. Bush - albeit narrowly 48%-47% - on the question “Who can best run the War on Terror?”

In all polls up until now, this had been the President’s strongest advantage over any opponent. It was his bedrock.

But if he has now ceded even this category to Kerry, of all people, then the President’s campaign is in dire trouble.

3) A Hidden Scandal: I have previously predicted - wrongly so far - of another huge, national scandal involving both political parties that was soon to break into the public.

So far it has not.

Will it?

Only God knows for sure.

But if and when it does, it will change the political landscape. And if it comes out before the November presidential election, it will also greatly impact the race.

It is huge. It involves both parties. It has nothing to do with sex. It involves the biggest cover-up in our political history.

And it is a total disgrace.

Pray that the truth comes out - and soon.


Next: more updates.

ABNORMAL MUTANTS


Years after Watergate - and his own time in a federal prison - Nixon White House aide John Ehrlichman was asked what kind of people run for President of the United States.

Without hesitating, he replied, “Only an abnormal mutant would even want to run for president.”

He meant that the process of getting to the White House is so arduous and intrusive that no one can have any life at all if they truly devote themselves to the goal of becoming president.

The last two weeks demonstrate how right - and how wrong - Ehrlichman was:

The Ronald Reagan funeral showed what a giant man he was. Was he an ‘abnormal mutant’? No! True, his love affair with Nancy was not normal by today’s standards and he did seem a little distant to all who knew him and worked with him. But he was totally balanced with an ego in check and a sense of bigger purpose.

Old Dutch went into politics to do something. His mission was to try to take away some of the power of the federal government in our lives and, of course, to back down the Soviet Union.

Ronnie never - ever - changed. He had his beliefs and fought for them - even when they were unpopular. Ronnie didn’t change from the 1964 Goldwater debacle to the 1980 Reagan Revolution; the times did.

By 1980, the nation was ready for Reagan.

And, heady with power, did Reagan change?

No!

Did he abuse his power in any way?

No!

He just spent his eight years trying to serve the nation he so loved. Period.

Now let us contrast this with the ongoing-Bill Clinton media campaign to sell his memoirs:

We now see the real Clinton: self-indulgent, self-absorbed, un-disciplined. In other words, he is a total mess of a human being.

He is almost admitting this in his interviews and promotions for this book.

Enormously intelligent and talented as a politician in the tv era, Clinton indeed is an abnormal mutant who rose to the Oval Office not to do something, but to be a somebody.

His insecurity fueled his energy and drive to be president. But for what? What did he do? What did he stand for?

OK, he did go along with GOP spending and taxing restraint and welfare reform. Good for him.

But he really stood for nothing in a decade of prosperity brought on by the Reagan Era tax cuts (which he vehemently opposed in the 1980's as Governor of Arkansas). President Clinton tried in 1993 to undo that progress with a massive tax increase mis-labeled as a ‘stimulus’ but after Hillary botched health care, the GOP took over Congress.

From that day on, the Clinton presidency was devoted to its own preservation - while Clinton himself was devoted to self-indulgent sex all because he “could.”

What a contrast between Reagan and Clinton: one went into politics to do something; the other went in just to be a somebody.

A good lesson for both parties: beware ‘abnormal mutants.’

John Kerry is a total abnormal mutant who even married two rich women for access to Big Bucks to finance his lifestyle and campaigns.

Like Clinton, Kerry is a mess of a man. Humorless, honorless and totally focused only on winning the Oval Office, he may very well succeed. He just wants to be a somebody; what he will do and stand for is of no importance to him.

And if he does win?

Watch out; he will be an awful leader for this country.