Second Holocaust: M.A.D. vs Madness
Watching the Israeli-Hamas War in the Gaza - which is at best ‘suspended pending further hostilities’, we need to ask a basic question: can the Arab countries ever accept Israel as their neighbor? Or will they continue to work toward the day when they can “drive Israel into the sea,” to use Yasser Arafat’s memorable words?
Pat Buchanan tells a revealing story that helps clarify where we might be headed: in the summer of 1967 just as the Six Day War - between Israel and Syria, Jordan and Egypt - had ended, former Vice President Richard Nixon and Pat Buchanan were traveling through the region and arrived at an Israeli medical tent in the Sinai desert. Israeli doctors were treating the wounded, including captured Egyptian soldiers. An Israeli doctor asked an Egyptian soldier he was patching up, “Look, we fought in 1948 and we won...then in ‘56 and we won...and now we have again won...why do you keep fighting us?”
The wounded Egyptian fighter replied, “Because you may defeat us 12 times but we will win the 13th time we fight.”
And, of course, that is the point: Israel is always on the verge of defeat by their neighbors (especially Syria, Hezbollah and Hamas) - and their neighbors’ sponsor (Iran).
Israel - created out of the painful memory of the Holocaust - has always vowed to “Never Again” allow itself or its people to be “exterminated.” So they have created not only a strong and vibrant economy out of an arid desert, but they also built a juggernaut of a military force - to act as a deterrent against any and all enemies who might try anything.
In the 60 years of Israel’s existence, their economy - coupled with huge amounts of US military aid - has allowed Israeli to develop a cutting-edge military force which includes nuclear weapons, although that has never been publicly acknowledged. The IDF - Israeli Defense Force - has won every war since 1948; it did struggle in 2006 with the invasion of southern Lebanon to stop similar rocket attacks to those lobbed in recently by Hamas; many view the Olmert Government’s response and preparedness as weak and soft.
But Israel’s clear military superiority over their enemies - separate or combined - has allowed Israel to survive in a difficult neighborhood for 60 years.
However we are now in a new era when the day is approaching when Israel’s enemies will acquire nuclear devices. Whether Iran develops its own, or oil-rich Arab potentates buy some on the black market, or Islamic radicals overthrow the Pakistani government and harness their already-operational nuclear arsenal - the Muslim enemies of Israel will soon have access to these weapons.
This should worry us all.
Most of us have lived our whole lives in the Nuclear Age; growing up in the 1950s and 1960s, we drilled for a nuclear war with the Soviet Union. Bomb shelters were built all over the US; we all prepped for nuclear attack.
But a prevailing doctrine has so far prevented either side - the USSR or the USA - or China - or Pakistan and India - from attacking each other with the Big One. That is the doctrine known as Mutual Assured Destruction (M.A.D.). Simply put, this was the logical, rational understanding by both sides that if either side launched a pre-emptive nuclear strike, the other side would quickly retaliate with a nuclear counter-strike which would kill hundreds of thousands of people. Thus the damage to both sides would be so huge that such a war was, in fact, not ‘winnable.’
Of course M.A.D. is predicated on rational thinking by the leaders of nuclear-armed nations. As ‘evil’ as the USSR was during the decades of the Cold War, Soviet leaders were rational enough to realize they could bluster and bully, but any first-strike nuclear attack meant such massive Soviet death and destruction that they could not win such a war.
In that sense - believe it or not - nuclear weapons have actually prevented wars or kept smaller wars from escalating. For example, these weapons may have kept the Soviets from invading Western Europe in the 1950's. And maybe the Red Chinese backed off invading South Korea because of our ‘nuclear tripwire’ there.
Now comes the key Mideast question: can M.A.D. work in the Arab-Muslim dispute? The Israelis are rational thinkers who do not want to incinerate their Arab neighbors. If they wanted to, they could do it at any time; and they could have done it for the four decades they have possessed these weapons while their enemies have not had them.
Muslim fanatics however are a different case. Their call to martyrdom counteracts the M.A.D. rationality argument.
Indeed, these radical Jew-haters can be classified as madmen who have no regard for human life, including the lives of their own people.
Thus the M.A.D. doctrine may run afoul of these crazed madmen who view their ticket to heaven as coming from killing as many Jews and Christians as possible.
Israel faces an uncertain and un-stable future. If the anti-Israeli faction gets their hands on nukes, they may use them against Israel regardless of the consequences to their own population. That is why we all must keep trying to prevent these nations from getting their mitts on nuclear devices.
Otherwise we may witness a second Holocaust.