It is clear that President Obama can be defeated in 2012.
That – by itself – is a huge change from six months ago – or even three months ago after the Osama Bin Laden take-down. In early May all the talk was how Obama had “guaranteed his re-election” by the successful killing of the 9/11 mastermind.
But a deteriorating economy will rot out any presidency – and even Obama, with his MSM media-love-fest – is not immune to this reality.
What is a worry is the GOP’s ability to blow elections that should be won.
We may be seeing this sad phenomenon developing right before our eyes.
Texas Governor Rick Perry – long described in this space as “George W. Bush on steroids” – in already confirming that analysis. To call the actions of the Chairman of the Federal Reserve “treasonous” and “treacherous” and then to threaten him with “ugly” Texas treatment should Ben Bernacke – a GW Bush appointee, by the way – visit the Lone Star State is so over the top as not to be believed!
Behavior like that – so minor league and un-presidential – is the exact type of thing that might rescue and re-elect Barack Obama.
Remember back to the 2010 mid-term congressional elections. There were two vulnerable Democratic Senate seats: Harry Reid in Nevada and the open seat in Delaware. In both cases the GOP – with strong Tea Party primary activity – nominated bad candidates. Sharon Angle and Christine O’Donnell blew winnable races.
Back in 2004 the same thing happened in Illinois. When Republican Senator Peter Fitzgerald chose not to run for re-election, the Democrats picked a state senator – Barack Obama – while the GOP fielded a series of fatally flawed candidates who each had to drop out of the race because of sex and financial scandals. Finally, out of total desperation, the Republicans brought in Alan Keyes from Maryland to oppose Obama who won in a walkover.
In 2008 Obama faced John McCain, one of the worst candidates of all time. Yes, the crumbling economy helped Obama, too. But McCain was so inept and the GOP/conservatives so un-enthusiastic about him, that Obama easily won.
So the pattern is clear: Obama has always had a free ride in general elections.
Will that pattern hold for the last campaign of his career? Or does he go out as a failed, one-term re-incarnation of Jimmy Carter?
The answer will be found in the quality of his Republican opponent – or if there is a credible Independent/Third Party candidate.
As of today only Rick Perry or Mitt Romney can win the GOP nomination. No one else in the current field – including Michelle Bachmann, who is confined to trying to win the Religious Right vote – can win the Republican nomination.
Both Perry and Romney are deeply flawed.
Perry tries so hard to court the hard right and the Tea Party that he is already making himself unacceptable to independent and non-Tea Party voters. That could still change over time – but the fight for the Right in Iowa with Bachmann will pull Perry even harder away from the political center – and may give Romney a chance to squeeze out an Iowa victory in next year’s caucuses.
Romney’s new strategy – with Perry and Bachmann now competing for the same bloc of votes – has to be to try for a surprise win in Iowa – remember: in 2007/2008, he was leading until Mike Huckabee came out of nowhere and won by having the Religious Right united behind him. This time, those voters could be split among Bachmann – who has to win Iowa to survive as a national candidate – Perry and Santorum. That may allow Romney to win Iowa.
Then comes New Hampshire, where Romney has to win – as a neighboring former governor who has a home in the Granite State – another loss in that state would doom him. But if Romney can win both Iowa and New Hampshire, then he is the 2012 GOP nominee.
Perry knows this. He also knows he has to win somewhere - either Iowa or New Hampshire – if he is to win the GOP nomination. (All GOP presidential nominees have won one or the other; no one has won the nomination without winning one or both.)
Bachmann blocks Perry from consolidating the Right/Tea Party vote, thus allowing an unpopular so-called front-runner – Romney – to have a path to victory.
It still makes no sense. How can the originator of mandated health care be nominated by a Republican Party that loathes ObamaCare?
He shouldn’t be the nominee. But Perry looks too-Texas and Bachmann has limited appeal.
Thus we have an unclear picture – and calls for more candidates to enter the race.
That may yet happen – especially as GOP voters begin to tire of the New Guy – Perry – and yearn for someone better.
We still have light years to go.